翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Turneria bidentata ・ Turneria collina ・ Turneria dahlii ・ Turneria frenchi ・ Turneria pacifica ・ Turner Broadcasting System Hungary ・ Turner Broadcasting System Italy ・ Turner Broadcasting System Latin America ・ Turner Broadcasting System Netherlands ・ Turner Broadcasting System Norway ・ Turner Broadcasting System Poland ・ Turner Broadcasting System Romania ・ Turner Broadcasting System Russia ・ Turner Broadcasting System Spain ・ Turner Broadcasting System Sweden ・ Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC ・ Turner Broadcasting tower ・ Turner Brothers' Building–American Household Storage Company ・ Turner Browne ・ Turner Carroll Gallery ・ Turner Cassity ・ Turner Catledge ・ Turner Cattle Pound ・ Turner Chapel Oakville, Ontario, Canada ・ Turner Classic Movies ・ Turner Classic Movies (around the world) ・ Turner Classic Movies (Asia) ・ Turner Classic Movies (UK & Ireland) ・ Turner Collection of Forgeries ・ Turner Collection of Newspaper Tax Stamps Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC ： ウィキペディア英語版 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC ''Turner Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission'', 512 U.S. 622 (1994), is the first of two United States Supreme Court cases dealing with the must carry rules imposed on cable television companies. Turner Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission (II), 520 U.S. 180 (1997) was the second. ''Turner I'' established that cable television companies were indeed First Amendment speakers but didn't decide whether the federal regulation of their speech infringed upon their speech rights. In ''Turner II'' the court decided that the must carry provisions were constitutional. Under the Miami Herald v. Tornillo case, it was unconstitutional to force a newspaper to run a story the editors would not have included absent a government statute because it was compelled speech which could not pass the strict scrutiny of a compelling state interest being achieved with the least restrictive means necessary to achieve the state interest. However, under the rule of Red Lion the High Court held that a federal agency could regulate broadcast stations (TV and Radio) with far greater discretion. In order for federal agency regulation of broadcast media to pass constitutional muster, it need only serve an important state interest and need not narrowly tailor its regulation to the least restrictive means. ( See levels of First Amendment Protection for different media ) ==Concurrence (Stevens)== *Congress’ policy judgment is entitled to substantial deference *Statute did not regulate the content of speech and therefore does not require the court to examine it with heightened scrutiny 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.